 |
| Think agan: Barack Obama, not so Bush lite, after all. (Image courtesy of salon.com.) |
Not overlooking the Orwellian connection, Maureen Dowd nailed Barry, the not so Bush Lite, yesterday for his recently exposed peeping policies in her NY Times op-ed:
WASHINGTON — THE acid that corroded George W. Bush’s presidency was fear — spreading it and succumbing to it.
You could see the fear in his eyes, the fear that froze him in place,
after Andy Card whispered to W. in that Florida classroom that a second
plane had crashed into the twin towers.
The blood-dimmed tragedy of 9/11 was chilling. But instead of rising
above the fear, W. let it overwhelm his better instincts. He and Dick
Cheney crumpled the Constitution, manipulated intelligence to go to war
against a country that hadn’t attacked us, and implemented warrantless
eavesdropping — all in the name of keeping us safe from terrorists.
Americans want to be protected, but not at the cost of vitiating the
values that make us Americans. That is why Barack Obama was so stirring
in 2007 with his spirited denunciations of W.’s toxic trade-offs. The
up-and-coming senator and former constitutional law professor railed
against the Bush administration’s “false choice, between the liberties
we cherish and the security we provide.”
Now that we are envisioning some guy in a National Security Agency
warehouse in Fort Meade, Md., going through billions of cat videos and
drunk-dialing records of teenagers, can the Ministries of Love and Truth
be far behind?
“There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at
any given moment,” George Orwell wrote in “1984.” “How often, or on
what system, the Thought Police plugged in on any individual wire was
guesswork. It was even conceivable that they watched everybody all the
time. But at any rate they could plug in your wire whenever they wanted
to.”
It was quaint to think we had any privacy left, once Google, Facebook,
Twitter and Instagram braided themselves into our days and nights.
As Gene Hackman, playing a disillusioned N.S.A. analyst in the 1998
movie “Enemy of the State” put it, the agency has been in bed with the
telecommunications industry for decades, and “they can suck a salt grain
off a beach.”
Still, it was a bit of a shock to find out that No Such Agency, as the
N.S.A. is nicknamed, has been collecting information for seven years on
every phone call, domestic and international, that Americans make. The
Guardian’s Glenn Greenwald, who first reported the collection of data
from Verizon, called the N.S.A. “the crown jewel in government secrecy.”
The Washington Post and then Greenwald swiftly revealed another secret
program started under Bush, code-named Prism, that lets the N.S.A. and
the F.B.I. tap Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, PalTalk, AOL, Skype,
YouTube and Apple, lifting audio and video chats, photographs, e-mails
and documents in an effort to track foreign targets
.
The Post reported that the career intelligence officer who leaked the
information was appalled and considered the program a gross intrusion on
privacy. “They quite literally can watch your ideas form as you type,”
the officer said.
President Obama defended his classified programs even as Greenwald
spilled one more bequeathed from W.: identifying targets overseas for
potential cyberattacks. So much technological overreach, yet
counterterrorism officials still couldn’t do basic police work and catch
the Boston bombers before the marathon by following up on warnings from
the Russians.
Read more:
