John Brennan, official portrait. |
The NY Times article below points out: "At issue is the critical question of how Congress conducts oversight of a shadow war against people suspected of being terrorists."
Here's the story:
WASHINGTON — The White House is refusing to share fully with Congress the legal opinions that justify targeted killings, while maneuvering to make sure its stance does not do anything to endanger the confirmation of John O. Brennan as C.I.A. director.
Rather than agreeing to some Democratic senators’ demands for full
access to the classified legal memos on the targeted killing program,
Obama administration officials are negotiating with Republicans to
provide more information on the lethal attack last year on the American
diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, according to three Congressional
staff members.
The strategy is intended to produce a bipartisan majority vote for Mr.
Brennan in the Senate Intelligence Committee without giving its members
seven additional legal opinions on targeted killing sought by senators
and while protecting what the White House views as the confidentiality
of the Justice Department’s legal advice to the president. It would
allow Mr. Brennan’s nomination to go to the Senate floor even if one or
two Democrats vote no to protest the refusal to share more legal memos.
At issue is the critical question of how Congress conducts oversight of a
shadow war against people suspected of being terrorists. The
administration routinely reports on its lethal drone strikes to both the
Senate and the House Intelligence and Armed Services Committees, but it
has long rebuffed Congressional attempts to see the legal opinions that
authorize the strikes — let alone requests to make them public.
No comments:
Post a Comment