Image via Cosmopolitan. |
Cosmopolitan article asks: "Why Aren't the Extra-Effective Women of the U.S. Senate Getting the Credit They Deserve?"
"About that do-nothing Congress: There are actually some members who are doing something, and most of them wear skirts to work."
Jill Filipovic writes:
Elizabeth Warren is a big name in the U.S. Senate today, but she almost didn't run at all.
Before
her election in 2012, Warren was one of the legal world's most-cited
scholars, an expert in bankruptcy, and a law professor at Harvard. After
the economic crash of 2008, she came to Washington, D.C., to champion
the creation of a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Warren
was a leading candidate to run the agency until Congressional
Republicans objected. So Warren packed up to leave Capitol Hill and
return to Harvard.
What's it like to be a woman in the Senate in 2015? Cosmopolitan invited the 20 sitting female senators to talk about that, and 16 of them took us up on the offer. In a series of interviews in Washington, D.C., they told us stories similar to Warren's. But they didn't describe a soft-focus sisterhood that propels them to work together. Instead, many of them said they've tapped into a style of collaborative leadership for one simple reason: It works.
Although they're a minority on Capitol Hill, the women of the Senate are among the country's most effective elected officials, working across the aisle more often than the Senate's men and keeping an increasingly fractured Congress creaking along ... even when, as they admit themselves, they don't always get the credit.
Read more:
No comments:
Post a Comment