Voters have the chance
to choose one of the most
broadly and deeply
qualified presidential
candidates in modern history.
to choose one of the most
broadly and deeply
qualified presidential
candidates in modern history.
For
the past painful year, the Republican presidential contenders have been
bombarding Americans with empty propaganda slogans and competing,
bizarrely, to present themselves as the least experienced person for the
most important elected job in the world. Democratic primary voters, on
the other hand, after a substantive debate over real issues, have the
chance to nominate one of the most broadly and deeply qualified
presidential candidates in modern history.
Hillary
Clinton would be the first woman nominated by a major party. She served
as a senator from a major state (New York) and as secretary of state —
not to mention her experience on the national stage as first lady with
her brilliant and flawed husband, President Bill Clinton. The Times
editorial board has endorsed her three times for federal office — twice for Senate and once in the 2008 Democratic presidential primary — and is doing so again with confidence and enthusiasm.
Mrs.
Clinton’s main opponent, Senator Bernie Sanders, a self-described
Democratic Socialist, has proved to be more formidable than most people,
including Mrs. Clinton, anticipated. He has brought income inequality
and the lingering pain of the middle class to center stage and pushed
Mrs. Clinton a bit more to the left than she might have gone on economic
issues. Mr. Sanders has also surfaced important foreign policy
questions, including the need for greater restraint in the use of
military force.
In
the end, though, Mr. Sanders does not have the breadth of experience or
policy ideas that Mrs. Clinton offers. His boldest proposals — to break
up the banks and to start all over on health care reform with a
Medicare-for-all system — have earned him support among alienated
middle-class voters and young people. But his plans for achieving them
aren’t realistic, while Mrs. Clinton has very good, and achievable,
proposals in both areas.
No comments:
Post a Comment