Yesterday, in his blog The Conscience of a Liberal, Paul Krugman, a Nobel Prize winning economist, urged Saint Bernie to start behaving responsibly. Krugman calls Bernie out for spouting innuendo about Hillary Clinton and for not sharing his massive fundraising resources with down ballot Democrats - folks from the party Bernie admittedly joined solely for its backing of his presidential candidacy.
In his blog post, "Feel the Math," Krugman writes:
The Sanders campaign
has come much further than almost anyone expected, to the point where
Sanders can have a lot of influence on the shape of the race. But with
influence comes responsibility, and it’s time to lay out some guidelines
for good and bad behavior.
The first thing to say
is that it’s still very unlikely that Sanders can win the nomination.
Don’t tell me about national polls (and cherry-pick the polls that show
your guy getting close); at this point it’s all about delegate counts,
where Clinton has a substantial lead with the voting more than half
over. The Times’s Upshot has a nice calculator
that takes account of what we know about demographic factors – Sanders
does well in very white states and in caucuses, not so much elsewhere –
and lets you experiment with various overall leads in what remains of
the race. To overtake Clinton in pledged delegates, Sanders would need
to win by about a 13 point margin from here on in:
Nothing in what we’ve
seen so far suggests that he’ll come anywhere close to that. He’ll
probably win Wisconsin next week, but that’s a demographically favorable state
for him, so unless it’s a huge blowout (which the polls aren’t
showing), Clinton will still be very much on track for the nomination.
Now, as the bumper stickers don’t quite say, stuff happens. But at this point it’s something like a 90 percent probability
that Hillary Clinton will be the Democratic nominee. Anyone denying
that arithmetic is basically pulling a con job on Sanders supporters.
So what does that say about appropriate behavior on the part of her rival? Two things, I’d argue.
Sanders hasn't been vetted, and once he is (IF he is) the shine will be off his armor. I don't think there's any reasoning with a man like Sanders. He's rogue, and listens to no one. The only thing we can do is be patient until Hillary locks up the nomination. Until then, buckle your seat belt, this is going to be a bumpy ride. He is rolling in money and has every intention of destroying the Democratic party and taking down Hillary with it. I just can't watch him or listen to him, and I don't like disliking anyone, but with Sanders that is getting harder and harder to prevent.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Ms. Becky. I agree with everything you've said.
ReplyDelete