Saturday, August 8, 2009

Without the Pedigree of a Kennedy, Clinton, or Cuomo, New York’s Senator Gillibrand Becomes Prohibitive Favorite


New York Gov. David Paterson, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and U.S. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand of New York.

Every so often African-Americans and members of other minority groups remind one another that they are not all required to be on the same page all the time; there’s room for diversity. Just so, women are beginning to realize that although they may not agree on every political issue, they can stand united in their opposition to sexism and misogyny as well as all other forms of bigotry. Representing 51 percent of the nation’s population, women could thus assure a major upsurge in political power.


The saga of politically conservative Kirsten Gillibrand, who recently replaced liberal Hillary Clinton as the junior senator of New York, is a good illustration of the above. The AP’s Valerie Baumann reports:


ALBANY, N.Y. — Kirsten Gillibrand didn't have the pedigree of a Kennedy, Clinton or a Cuomo. She was not, her critics said, up to the challenge of winning a tough, New York brawl for the U.S. Senate seat Gov. David Paterson handed her.


But on Friday, the last of the established threats to her candidacy backed away from a promised Democratic primary showdown, leaving Gillibrand a smoother ride to a full, six-year term when she faces election next year. U.S. Rep. Carolyn Maloney, who just last month raised $300,000 at a dinner that featured former President Bill Clinton, said there was too much to do in Congress to spend the next year campaigning.


In less than seven months, Gillibrand went from vulnerable and criticized to a prohibitive favorite. A primary election fight is the biggest threat to Gillibrand in a state where registered Democrats outnumber Republicans 2-to-1. No Republican has emerged as a general election opponent.


"The deal is done," said Doug Muzzio, a politics professor at Baruch College. "She's the Democratic primary candidate and she's not going to face any substantial opposition."


When the little-known, conservative-leaning U.S. representative was named to succeed Hillary Rodham Clinton as New York's junior senator in January, Democrats in the state fractured. Loyalists backed her, but others balked, despite vocal support from President Barack Obama and New York Sen. Charles Schumer, a political force in the chamber.


The early favorite for the Senate seat, political scion Caroline Kennedy, backed out at the last minute for reasons that have never become clear. Another possible senator, state Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, also was passed over (though he never publicly said he wanted the job).


Gillibrand's conservative views on guns and immigration drew sharp criticism from more liberal Democrats in the state. Besides Maloney, U.S. Reps. Steve Israel and Carolyn McCarthy considered primary challenges.


Read more:





Friday, August 7, 2009

Secretary Clinton Laughs Off John Bolton (video)

Ya gotta love Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's response to John Bolton's criticism of Bill's successful trip to North Korea. Watch:

Bill Clinton’s Trip to North Korea Incites Media Malpractice

Statesman Bill Clinton continues to show respect for the Obama Administration and his wife Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in restricting his comments about his trip to North Korea to the rescue of journalists Laura Ling and Euna Lee.


But as Joe Conason notes in his post at Salon.com titled Clinton Derangement Syndrome, North Korean Strain, the usual practitioners of media malpractice are dead set on belittling Clinton’s recent achievement on the world stage, an achievement you’d think even the most deranged would want to celebrate.



Conason writes:


Here was an effort that exemplified the best of America -- a society that values the lives of its citizens enough to send a former head of state, with all the power of government behind him, to the aid of two women in distress. Here was a happy reunion, bringing wives home to their husbands and a mother back to her little girl, that surely uplifted the spirit of anyone who actually believes in family values. Here was a moment of pride and joy.

But not for Gordon Liddy, the demented felon and radio bigot who cackled about "Ling Ling and Wee Wee being locked up for nine hours in an airplane with Bill Clinton." Not for Rush Limbaugh, the obsessive guttersnipe who wondered aloud whether Clinton "hit on those two female journalists on the long flight home." Not for Andrea Peyser, the curdled tabloid columnist who insisted that "the whole shebang was nakedly scripted and staged as a device to help rehabilitate the image of former President Bill Clinton" (and who neglected to mention that Clinton did not speak to the eagerly waiting press corps and has given not a single interview on the North Korea mission). Not for Times columnist Maureen Dowd, who predictably seized on Clinton's mission as an opportunity for gratuitous and ugly insults to his wife, weirdly imagining that the prisoner release was "some clever North Korean revenge plot, giving the limelight to Daddy to punish Mommy." And not for the editors of the Huffington Post, who posted a very strange headline -- "Bill Upstages Hillary ... Once Again" -- on an Associated Press story that didn’t mention her at all.

Analysts have long speculated on the sexual envy that may or may not predispose the syndrome’s sufferers to say these things. What seems clear, however, is that no matter what humanitarian acts Clinton may perform in his post-presidency, he cannot do anything without provoking such inappropriate and embarrassing outbursts. The result, of course, is that their remarks always reveal more about them than about their intended target.

And I personally continue to wonder why the likes of Huffington Post editors and assorted pundits and scribes intent on destroying Bill and Hillary Clinton seldom if ever find it appropriate to remind readers of the sexual indiscretions of the Kennedy boys, Newt Gingrich, MLK, Jr., Jesse Jackson, et all. And as for the spouses of the aforementioned, I’ve never come across a feminist diatribe condemning Jackie Kennedy for preserving her marriage to JFK; that particular criticism seems reserved only for Hillary Clinton.

Thursday, August 6, 2009

Sotomayor Confirmed Along Party Lines, 68-31

Thomas Ferraro reported for Reuters minutes ago:


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Judge Sonia Sotomayor won U.S. Senate approval on Thursday to become the first Hispanic on the U.S. Supreme Court.


The Democratic-led Senate voted largely along party lines, 68-31, to approve President Barack Obama's nomination of Sotomayor for the lifetime appointment on the highest U.S. court.


The large number of Republican "no" votes reflected the party's resistance to the Democratic president on several fronts including his bid to overhaul healthcare.


When sworn in, Sotomayor, 55, a federal appeals judge in New York since 1998, will be the first Hispanic and the third woman to serve on the 220-year-old Supreme Court.


Read more:



The Obama Administration: “Chicago is My Kind of Town”


If nothing else during Obama’s tenure as president, we’re all going to get a better feel for Chicago-style politics. Native Chicagoan John Kass, a columnist for the Chicago Tribune, explains how the Obama Administration is adapting Daley machine tactics to suit its purposes.


Kass writes:

Darrell Issa, a Republican congressman from Southern California, has sent a stern letter to Rahm Emanuel, chief of staff of the Chicago Way White House.


Issa's letter asks Emanuel to stop using Chicago-style political rough stuff against Republican critics of President Barack Obama's gazillion-dollar economic stimulus program.


This new Republican thriftiness is curious. When they ran Washington, they spent like drunken sailors, though now they've sobered up and cling numbly to their conservative fiscal roots. Meanwhile, Democrats are out-drunken-sailoring the Republicans, perhaps fueled by "weezy," which I learned the other day is a mixture of champagne and ecstasy.


Either way, Issa is demanding to know who is behind a series of letters sent by several Obama Cabinet secretaries to Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer that subtly threaten to withhold federal dollars from the state if Republican critics like Sen. Jon Kyl of Arizona don't shut up. The letters are curiously Rahmsian in tone:


"However, if you prefer to forfeit the money we are making available to your state ... please let me know," wrote Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood, a former Illinois congressman who is no stranger to how things work in Chicago.

Wow! It would seem the “new politics” candidate Obama promised to bring to Washington has a lot in common with the old politics of Chicago, his adopted hometown.

Read more:



Is the Media Growing Up?!! Wapo and Huffpo Belatedly Get the Message




It’s too soon to tell whether or not the media is growing up, but recent occurrences offer hope that at least two prominent online news outlets may have begun to get the message that the usual sexism targeting Hillary Clinton and the reflexive attacks on both Bill and Hillary are inappropriate.

The first incident featured a beer summit spoof in which Wapo’s Dana Milbank suggested that Hillary Clinton drink Mad Bitch Beer. Howard Kurtz reports today:

Executive Editor Marcus Brauchli killed the satirical video series Wednesday after harsh criticism of a joke about Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, which prompted him to pull the latest episode from the paper's Web site Friday night. The Post staffers who appeared in the videos, Dana Milbank and Chris Cillizza, agreed with the decision and apologized in separate interviews.


In the second incident, the Huffington Post was incapable of celebrating yesterday’s stunning achievement by the team of Clinton, Clinton, and Obama in securing the release of Euna Lee and Laura Ling without indulging in its trademark tabloid journalism style shown in the screen shot above. As I noted in yesterday’s post, it took Huffpo all day to catch on, but thousands of commenters eventually pressured the powerful blog to change the headline. Huffpo even published Taylor Marsh’s take on the incident that concluded with:

I also shouldn't have to tell you that running a headline blaring "BILL UPSTAGES HILLARY.... ONCE AGAIN" on a day two journalists lives were saved from doing twelve years hard labor in a North Korean prison camp made Huffington Post look silly. Petty. Small.

You screwed up.


The larger message from the above is that the public needs to keep saying NO to the media’s sexism and misogyny.