Maureen Dowd, the #1 Hillary basher. |
I’ve been meaning to link to Anita Finlay’s post at The New
Agenda in which she “defangs a Hillary basher” since it was first published. Finlay's answer to the question, “Is Maureen
Dowd Necessary?” remains acutely relevant in the run up to the 2016 election.
Finlay has reminded me that in 2008, Arianna Huffington and Maureen Dowd
were among the most vitriolic media types on the attack against Hillary
Clinton. Dowd is already revving up for the next round, but Finlay, and
hopefully others, have MoDo's number:
Dowd’s latest columns bash both mother and daughter. First Dowd trashes Chelsea Clinton for the $75,000 fee she earns making speeches, although she donates every dollar to the Clinton Foundation. Dowd, on the other hand, receive $30,000 per speech (giving about 12 per year). No chump change that. No word on how much she donates, however.
Then Dowd intimates that the only real star in the family (or in politics) is former President Bill, whom she finds equally distasteful, if charismatic…so much so, in fact, that Dowd avers he will have to drag his dull dolt of a wife across the finish line if she runs for President once more.
Since Ms. Dowd was one of the chief Hillary-bashers in 2008 and shows no sign of let up, it might be useful to deconstruct Ms. Dowd’s er, logic, as a tool to neutralize the negative effect her years of denigrating comments have on the reader’s psyche when it comes to Secretary Clinton and her family.
Herewith is a chapter from my book, Dirty Words on Clean Skin…
Women will never break the highest, hardest glass ceiling when other highly regarded women use their platforms to rip each other to shreds for what can only be monetary gain or a personal vendetta:
“Unfortunately for Hillary,
there’s no White Bitch Month.”[i]
–
Maureen Dowd
Read more:
No comments:
Post a Comment