Showing posts with label Women Supporters Count Too. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Women Supporters Count Too. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Hillary Confronts Sexism on the Trail in Kentucky


It’s been awhile since the “Iron my shirt!” incident at a Hillary Clinton rally in New Hampshire, which may have helped Clinton humiliate the pollsters and pundits by taking the Granite State’s primary.

But many women will tell you their outrage has simmered ever since. It reached the boiling point recently with the formation of Women Supporters Count Too, led by Cynthia Ruccia of Ohio.

Hillary has persevered on the campaign trail, putting in long hours and making her case to the voters in states like Ohio, Texas, Pennsylvania, Indiana, and West Virginia. With her blow out win in West Virginia, she’d won five of the last six primaries, compared to Obama’s single win in North Carolina.

Incredibly, after her West Virginia win, the pundits joined forces with the Obama camp in an all out effort to force Clinton out of the race. John Edwards leapt aboard the Obama bandwagon the very next day in a grandstanding attempt to take the sting out of Obama’s humiliating defeat in the Mountain State.

In today’s Washington Post, Lois Romano reports from Maysville, Kentucky that Clinton is confronting sexism out on the trail. Romano begins:

“Women of all ages and nationalities push against the rope line carrying books and T-shirts, posters and stuffed animals -- anything for her to autograph. They tote huge signs that shout "Hillary Cares About Me"-- and they tearfully grab her hand to implore her to stick it out, to take her trailing campaign all the way to the Democratic convention in Denver.

“They say they have come to show support for Hillary Clinton not merely because she is a woman or because her campaign is breaking historic ground, but because she speaks to them about their real problems and they are furious at the way she has been treated.”

Romano continues:

“In an interview after church services in Bowling Green on Sunday, Clinton for the first time addressed what women have been talking about for months, what she refers to as the "sexist" treatment she has endured at the hands of the pundits, media and others. The lewd T-shirts. The man who shouted "Iron my shirt" at a campaign event. The references to her cleavage and her cackle.

‘“It's been deeply offensive to millions of women,’ Clinton said. ‘I believe this campaign has been a groundbreaker in a lot of ways. But it certainly has been challenging given some of the attitudes in the press, and I regret that, because I think it's been really not worthy of the seriousness of the campaign and the historical nature of the two candidacies we have here.”’

Romano describes an inspired and invigorated candidate:

“An energetic Clinton has stormed Kentucky's middle-class communities for the past four days, shoring up her support before Tuesday's primary, which she is expected to win overwhelmingly. She's attracting some of the biggest and most intense crowds she's seen in weeks, such as the 2,000 who attended her rally in Lexington on Monday night, where she was joined by her husband. And while there are plenty of men in the stands, it's the women who are most passionate.

“And so as her Democratic opponent refers to her politely in the past tense, and the likely Republican presidential nominee simply ignores her, and the pundits snicker that she's delusional and should just step aside already, she is a woman definitely not preparing her remarks for a graceful exit anytime soon. And that's what her supporters want to hear.”

To read Romano’s entire article, go here.

Here are a couple of must read articles documenting the sexist and misogynist assaults on Hillary Clinton throughout the Democratic primary:

Jonathon Tilove's article in the Seattle Times, Hillary Hatred Finds Its Misogynistic Voice and

Stanley Fish’s post at Think Again (NY Times), All You Need is Hate.

And in case you missed it, check out this video that stunningly portrays what Hillary Clinton has been up against in this campaign.


Friday, May 16, 2008

Sexism and Misogyny in the Premature Canonization of Barack Obama

At regular intervals throughout the Democratic primary, party operatives have joined forces with the media in trying to force Hillary Clinton out of the race. Their latest effort came on the heels of the North Carolina and Indiana primaries. Obama won big in North Carolina, but adding her win in Indiana to earlier victories in Ohio, Texas, and Pennsylvania, Clinton had just taken four of the last five primaries. Nevertheless, the good old boys intensified their calls for her and her supporters to sit down, shut up, and get with the program.

Clinton responded a few days later by mopping the floor with Obama in West Virginia. She’s expected to do the same in Kentucky next Tuesday, even though John Edwards, the twice-failed populist candidate with his $400 haircuts, has just endorsed Obama to help win a few votes from working class Americans.

In the meantime, the outrage among American women has finally come to a head led by Cynthia Ruccia’s group, Clinton Supporters Count Too. The group has put the Democratic party on notice for trying to force out Hillary Clinton, the better qualified candidate, in favor of a man that Gerard Baker in the Times Online this morning tells us is representative of a particular genre among Democratic candidates.

Baker explains:

You will not see a finer example of the genre than the cover story of this week's Newsweek, which was entitled “The O Team”. This rhapsodic inside account of Senator Obama's campaign reads a little like a cross between Father Alban Butler's Life of St Francis and the sort of authorised biography of Kim Jong Il you can pick up in any good bookshop in Pyongyang.”

Baker goes on to say:

“The idolatry of Mr Obama is a shame, really. The Illinois senator is indeed, an unusually talented, inspiring and charismatic figure. His very ethnicity offers an exciting departure. But he is not a saint. He is a smart and eloquent man with a personal history that is startlingly shallow set against the scale of the office he seeks to hold. It is not only legitimate, but necessary, to scrutinise his past and infer what it might tell us about his beliefs, in the absence of the normal record of achievement expected in a presidential nominee.

“If the past 40 years have taught us anything they have surely taught that premature canonisation is an almost certain guarantee of subsequent deep disappointment.”

I disagree with several of Gerard Baker’s comments in this op-ed, but I think his take on Barack Obama is spot on.

Obviously, the Democratic party is ready once again to dive off the cliff in a presidential campaign by nominating the lesser qualified candidate. It’s no wonder Clinton Supporters Count Too are leading a women’s rebellion on the crest of growing outrage among women at the sexism and misogyny endured for months by Hillary Clinton.

A little reminder: women make up more than 50 percent of the Democratic party's membership.