Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Hillary Confronts Sexism on the Trail in Kentucky


It’s been awhile since the “Iron my shirt!” incident at a Hillary Clinton rally in New Hampshire, which may have helped Clinton humiliate the pollsters and pundits by taking the Granite State’s primary.

But many women will tell you their outrage has simmered ever since. It reached the boiling point recently with the formation of Women Supporters Count Too, led by Cynthia Ruccia of Ohio.

Hillary has persevered on the campaign trail, putting in long hours and making her case to the voters in states like Ohio, Texas, Pennsylvania, Indiana, and West Virginia. With her blow out win in West Virginia, she’d won five of the last six primaries, compared to Obama’s single win in North Carolina.

Incredibly, after her West Virginia win, the pundits joined forces with the Obama camp in an all out effort to force Clinton out of the race. John Edwards leapt aboard the Obama bandwagon the very next day in a grandstanding attempt to take the sting out of Obama’s humiliating defeat in the Mountain State.

In today’s Washington Post, Lois Romano reports from Maysville, Kentucky that Clinton is confronting sexism out on the trail. Romano begins:

“Women of all ages and nationalities push against the rope line carrying books and T-shirts, posters and stuffed animals -- anything for her to autograph. They tote huge signs that shout "Hillary Cares About Me"-- and they tearfully grab her hand to implore her to stick it out, to take her trailing campaign all the way to the Democratic convention in Denver.

“They say they have come to show support for Hillary Clinton not merely because she is a woman or because her campaign is breaking historic ground, but because she speaks to them about their real problems and they are furious at the way she has been treated.”

Romano continues:

“In an interview after church services in Bowling Green on Sunday, Clinton for the first time addressed what women have been talking about for months, what she refers to as the "sexist" treatment she has endured at the hands of the pundits, media and others. The lewd T-shirts. The man who shouted "Iron my shirt" at a campaign event. The references to her cleavage and her cackle.

‘“It's been deeply offensive to millions of women,’ Clinton said. ‘I believe this campaign has been a groundbreaker in a lot of ways. But it certainly has been challenging given some of the attitudes in the press, and I regret that, because I think it's been really not worthy of the seriousness of the campaign and the historical nature of the two candidacies we have here.”’

Romano describes an inspired and invigorated candidate:

“An energetic Clinton has stormed Kentucky's middle-class communities for the past four days, shoring up her support before Tuesday's primary, which she is expected to win overwhelmingly. She's attracting some of the biggest and most intense crowds she's seen in weeks, such as the 2,000 who attended her rally in Lexington on Monday night, where she was joined by her husband. And while there are plenty of men in the stands, it's the women who are most passionate.

“And so as her Democratic opponent refers to her politely in the past tense, and the likely Republican presidential nominee simply ignores her, and the pundits snicker that she's delusional and should just step aside already, she is a woman definitely not preparing her remarks for a graceful exit anytime soon. And that's what her supporters want to hear.”

To read Romano’s entire article, go here.

Here are a couple of must read articles documenting the sexist and misogynist assaults on Hillary Clinton throughout the Democratic primary:

Jonathon Tilove's article in the Seattle Times, Hillary Hatred Finds Its Misogynistic Voice and

Stanley Fish’s post at Think Again (NY Times), All You Need is Hate.

And in case you missed it, check out this video that stunningly portrays what Hillary Clinton has been up against in this campaign.


Monday, May 19, 2008

A New Video From Shut The Freud Up Productions

IndyRobin and GeekLove are pleased to announce their latest video from Shut The Freud Up Productions:

"DNC: Fractured Fairly Tales"

Their last video "Mad as Hell" was seen by over 165,000 people. It was written about in Salon (twice), Newsday, was mentioned by the New York Times, and was prominently featured on the front page of most blogs supportive of Hillary Clinton.

According to its creators, this video is different from the first, but equally important. "Mad As Hell" exposed the sexism in the MSM. "DNC: Fractured Fairly Tales" purports to expose the DNC for who they really are.

IndyRobin and GeekLove invite you to go directly to YouTube, watch the video, recommend it, rate it as your favorite video, and leave a comment.

Their goal is to help elect Hillary Rodham-Clinton as President of the United States: "She has never stopped working for us, so let's not stop working for her. "

P.S.

You are also invited to check out IndyRobin and GeekLove's new blog, Shut the Freud Up.

Everyone Knows Hillary Clinton is the Stronger Candidate

Hillary Clinton is down there in Kentucky campaigning up until the last minute to drive turnout tomorrow; she’s earned every vote she’s received in the Democratic race, and she’s more than lived up to her reputation as a hard worker on behalf of the American people from her years in the U.S. Senate.

And Clinton will not be intimidated by pundits of any stripe.

After months of bashing Hillary daily at the Huffpost, media guru Arianna Huffington published a flattering obituary for Hillary’s campaign, and there’s poison to be found even in the banner headline: “A Historic Triumph Out of Defeat.”

Arianna’s condescending post is her way of telling Hillary she’s fought a good fight and now it’s time to sit down, shut up, and get with the program, so the haloed Obama, the one Arianna has been waiting for, can take his victory lap unhampered Tuesday night.

Sorry, Arianna.

The Caucus (NY Times) has Clinton’s word from Kentucky today:

‘“I’m going to make my case and I’m going to make it until I’m the nominee and we’re not going to have one today and we’re not going to have one tomorrow and we’re not going to have one the next day,” she said. “And if Kentucky turns out tomorrow, I will be closer to that nomination.”’

Clinton buttressed her electoral argument for the nomination by citing a memo obtained by ABC from Karl Rove. What the heck – even Rove has the smarts to know that Hillary Clinton will be the stronger candidate against the Republicans come November. You can see Rove’s maps and charts here.

So, Sweetie, Since When Do People Demand That the Winner Quit?



Photo credits: Getty


Susan Estrich nails it over at RealClearPolitics this morning with her post titled “The Year of the 'Sweetie?”

Estrich begins with some background before hammering Obama, et al, for the rampant sexism in the Democratic race, reinforced and amplified by the good old boys network in the media:

‘“Have we gone from the ‘Year of the Woman’ to the ‘Year of the Sweetie’?

‘“So it appears. It's not the ‘sweetie’ part that gets me, and I suspect a lot of other women. It's the concern that, not to sound trite, some of the guys out there, maybe including the probable Democratic nominee for President, just don't ‘get it.’”

“If you can remember that far back, this was supposed to be another one of those ‘Year of the Woman’ elections, the first time a woman was entering the race as the frontrunner for her party's nomination, with the big question being whether women would see this as the historic occasion it was and abandon their concerns about whether Hillary should've dumped Bill over Monica and whether it was her ambition that kept them together. Hillary's problems with women, going back to the ‘stand by her man’ comment and her lack of interest in baking chocolate chip cookies, have been discussed literally for decades. During her first Senate race, it took her months of listening, the patronizing sexism of her opponent in their one and only debate, and a particularly effective ad by a breast cancer survivor reminding women that Hillary would be there for them on the issues that matter, before women moved to support her in major numbers and handed her a substantial majority of the votes. So there was some doubt, this time, about whether women would support one of their own or, maybe more fundamentally, see Hillary Rodham Clinton that way.

‘“They have. Women ‘saved’ Hillary in New Hampshire, or at least that's what all the talkers said that night, when to their great surprise, Hillary easily defeated Obama after her much-discussed "tearing up" in a roundtable on the day before the election in a New Hampshire diner. And they have been with her in every major contest since, especially white and Hispanic women. And not just elite, well-educated professional women, the black suit girls like herself (and yours truly) who could so easily recognize in so much of the sexism displayed towards Hillary by the media and the mavens the forces we have all confronted in our pursuit of our dreams. No, working women of every stripe, mothers and grandmothers, single and married, are the reason that Obama's near unanimous backing by African-Americans and his success among elites in low-turnout caucuses has not been enough to allow him to clinch the nomination, at least not yet.”

Estrich recaps the “Sweetie” incident:

“In case you missed the latest, Senator Obama responded to a Detroit reporter asking him a question about his plans for economically depressed Michigan workers by dismissing her as ‘Sweetie.’

‘“Senator, asked Peggy Agar, ‘how are you going to help the American autoworkers?”’

‘“Hold on a second, sweetie. We'll hold a press avail,’ Obama replied, putting her off until a later press conference.

‘“That's a bad habit of mine," Obama said in a voicemail message he left for the reporter some hours later. ‘I do it sometimes with all kinds of people. I mean no disrespect and so I am duly chastened on that front.’

“It was not Senator Obama's first public ‘sweetie.’ Earlier in the campaign, Obama said to a woman, ‘Sweetie, if I start with a picture I will never get out of here.’ And: ‘Sweetie if I start doing autographs I just won't be ... I am really late.’

“Agar, reached for comment later, said she'd been called worse things. Who hasn't? It's no big deal. I call people ‘sweetie’ myself, although I usually reserve it for people I know.

Estrich explains:

“If there were no wounds to be rubbing salt into, it wouldn't matter. But there are. And Senator Obama and his supporters need to understand that.

“For many women, Hillary Clinton was not just another candidate, and the fact that this campaign has been drenched in sexism has only made that identification stronger. Watching Hillary take a beating and come back, watching mostly (but not entirely) male reporters and pundits demean and dismiss her, question her motives, her appearance and her sexual orientation, has brought home for many women not how far we've come, but how far we have to go. Seeing the vigor with which some, starting with the abortion rights group NARAL Pro-Choice America, pounced on Clinton's victory in West Virginia to try to push her off the stage (since when do people demand that the winner quit?), has produced far more anger and resentment among women than Obama's reference to Ms. Agar as ‘sweetie.’ There is nothing sweet about the way Hillary has been covered in this campaign, about the way she has been attacked, about the meanness and mean-spiritedness that has been in evidence from the beginning. If women didn't understand why we need a woman President when we started this march, a good many of them surely do now.


“Will these women ultimately vote for Barack Obama? Maybe. The ‘gender gap,’ much discussed in every election cycle in the last three decades, is the shorthand version of much longer analysis of why it is that women are more likely to vote Democratic than men; while women are hardly a voting bloc, the fact that we earn less than men, live longer, and worry more about domestic issues all play some role in making us more likely to end up in the Democratic column. If Obama is to win, he needs the votes of women, sweeties or not. It should not be taken for granted. Or rather, we shouldn't.

Clinton Gaining in Oregon; Another Blowout Win Expected in Kentucky

Photo credits: socialitereport.com/photos/kentucky

Ignore those dramatic photos spread across the Web this morning showing the huge crowd Obama drew in Portland yesterday.

It’s the day before the Oregon and Kentucky primaries, and the latest polls show Clinton closing the gap with Obama in Oregon where he no longer holds a double-digit lead, and she's headed for another blowout victory in Kentucky.

As reported by Political Intelligence (Boston Globe), “Obama leads 45 percent to 41 percent with 8 percent undecided and 6 percent refusing a response, according to a Suffolk University survey released this morning. An American Research Group survey puts Obama's lead at 50 percent to 45 percent.”

Political Intel reports that “Clinton continues to lead handily in every poll in Kentucky, which also votes Tuesday. In a Suffolk survey released today, she leads Obama 51 percent to 25 percent, followed by John Edwards with 6 percent, "uncommitted" with 5 percent, while 11 percent were undecided.”

“But,” Political Intel continues, “she {Clinton} isn't taking any chances and hopes to win big enough to cut into Obama's lead in the total popular vote, campaigning all day in the Bluegrass State. She plans her primary night rally in Louisville.”

Go, Hillary!

P.S.

Obama's rumored victory lap on Tuesday night in Iowa has apparently been cancelled although he's still planning to hold a rally there. Something must have deflated his hubris - at least temporarily.

Hillary Makes Her Case in the Bluegrass State

In today’s New York Times, a confident Hillary Clinton campaigns in Kentucky in the run up to the primary in the Bluegrass state tomorrow.

(Be sure to read my footnote to the Times article on the underhanded strategy of Obama and Edwards in Michigan and of the Obama campaign in Florida.)

The Times article reports:

“Mrs. Clinton has continued to make the case that she is a better candidate than Mr. Obama, delivering a stump speech in Bowling Green that highlighted many familiar points: that she will be ready on Day 1, will be a more capable commander in chief, and is more experienced in foreign policy matters.

““I’m going to get to work as soon as I’m inaugurated to make sure that we do build a strong and prosperous middle class,” she told a crowd at the Maker’s Mark distillery in Loretto, Ky.

“And she has argued to audiences here that she is leading in the popular vote, based on a count that includes the elections in Florida and Michigan, whose votes were moved up in violation of Democratic Party rules. (Mr. Obama was not on the ballot in Michigan; neither candidate campaigned in Florida.)*

‘“I’ll tell you where this race stands right now,” Mrs. Clinton told a crowd in Mayfield on Sunday. “Right now I am leading in the popular vote. More Americans have voted for me. And the states that I have won are states that a Democrat has to win to be elected in the fall.”’

*What the Times article fails to mention above is that Mr. Obama chose to take his name off the ballot in Michigan, and he and John Edwards both urged residents of the Wolverine state to vote uncommitted to humiliate Clinton. Despite the “old politics” style strategy of those two young men, Clinton won handily in Michigan. The Times article also fails to report that even though the party forbade candidates to campaign in either Michigan or Florida, the Obama campaign ran ads in Florida prior to the primary. Hillary followed the rules, and the voters turned out in force to support her.

Sunday, May 18, 2008

Clinton Campaign Undaunted by Obama’s Scary Display of Hubris

After grandstanding for the press earlier this week by jumping to the questionable conclusion that President Bush had singled him out as an “appeaser” in his speech to Israel’s Knesset, Barack Obama has subsequently displayed even further evidence of a smug and scary hubris. He’s planning to celebrate his crowning as the Democratic nominee with a rally in Iowa Tuesday night, even though the Rules Committee won’t resolve the Michigan and Florida issue until May 31, and the latest polls show the race between him and Sen. Hillary Clinton is still close.

According to RealClearPolitics, the national poll average this morning shows Obama leading Clinton by only 6.8 points, just barely exceeding the margin for error. In the upcoming primaries, Obama leads in Oregon by an average of 14.3 points while Clinton leads in Kentucky by a whopping 28.8 points.

It will be interesting to see Obama taking bows onstage Tuesday night in Iowa as his adoring flock chants “Yes, we can” when word reaches the anointed one that Clinton has replicated her win in West Virginia by mopping the floor with him in Kentucky.

Clinton Supporters Count Too pointed out the other day:

“THIS IS NOT OVER…DON'T LET ANYONE TELL YOU IT IS AND DON'T LET YOURSELF THINK IT IS. IT IS NOT OVER. This is only one part of the Road to the White House and the candidates are statistically neck to neck. The next step is the Resolution of FL and MI and we will demonstrate in Washington on May 31st when the Rules Committee meets. Save the date. …more later. Each time we enter a new phase we will determine the most effective strategy and communicate it to you. Your part is to help make it happen throughout OH, MI, PA and FL, the critical states where we have the advantage.”

Plus, WomenCount has reported dramatic success in fundraising:

WomenCount, a new PAC formed to fund full-page ads to run this week for Hillary Clinton has received more than $170,000 in 48 hours from women all around the country. The PAC will fund ads in USA Today, the NY Times, and some regional newspapers.

You can view the ad over at TaylorMarsh.

"WomenCount PAC was created to ensure that the 51 percent of American citizens who are women have their values and votes counted in the political process.”